Thinkdigital World Technology Reviews Tech Opinion Digital News

Recent Posts

Whenever we left from what are the things we check? Or is some kind of compulsory to carry??
Keys?? Cell phone?? Id card?? Cash?? Actually I need all of this.

But in USA people with iPhone are already having obsolete credit cards, courtesy of Apple Pay.  

Any American with an iphone 6 has officially obsolete charge cards, civility of Apple Pay. Any Kenyan, Senegalese, and so on with a telephone has since quite a while ago obsolete money, affability of M-Pesa, Orange Money, and so on.

With respect to ID, well, in case you're in Iowa, simply hold up: "Iowans will soon have the capacity to utilize a versatile application on their cell phones as their authority driver's permit at some point in 2015." Can the other 49 states be a long ways behind? Actually, yes. In any case will they be? Expect an abundance of government ID applications at some point throughout the following few years.

In America, money is still the genuine staying point for wallet substitution. Possibly, in case we're fortunate, Coinbase, Changetip, and other Bitcoin new companies will inevitably drag America up to close comparability with African e-money. I absolutely wouldn't set out for some expecting American banks and bearers to do it.

Shouldn't something be said about keys? Effectively set. Kwikset's Kevo let you utilize Bluetooth LE to open your home. Lockitron. Both additionally give you a chance to send makeshift e-keys to visitors, an extremely cool peculiarity not accessible for physical locks.

So on a fundamental level, in the event that you live in Iowa, and don't much utilize money, then when one year from now, you can purchase one of those electronic bolts and dispose of your keys and wallet everlastingly.

However you most likely won't. Since in the event that you ask me, the genuine hindrance notwithstanding key/wallet substitution isn't applications; it’s excess. Lose your telephone today, and you can in any case pay for a ride home and let yourself in. Yet in the event that your telephone duplicates as your key and your wallet, then if/when it’s lost or stolen, you are all of a sudden screwed mind boggling.

Particularly since most online administrations are moving to two-element approval, in which the second variable is a code sent to your telephone. This thusly is considerably more powerless than your keys or wallet. You don't invest a large portion of your waking time waving the recent two around.

So: I anticipate that inside the following 2-3 years, a hefty portion of you will have the capacity to supplant your keys and wallet with your telephone — however few on the off chance that you will really do along these lines, until and unless the excess issue is explained.

Different arrangements do instantly happen, however all are defective. The capacities to provisional download your telephone's approvals/settings onto another/acquired telephone? Possibly, yet that seems like a key-administration security bad dream to me. (Private encryption key, not physical entryway opening key.) Temporary approval for a companion or trusted administration who can take you home and open your entryway? Once more, not without its own particular defects.

Gracious yes. Furthermore recall: unless you claim a Blackphone, you don't control your telephone. Its maker does, its transporter does, and whoever composed its OS does, yet you likely don't have root on its fundamental chip, and you without a doubt don't have root on its baseband processor or its SIM card. Do you truly need your each budgetary exchange, your whole legitimate character, and your right to gain entrance to your own particular home to be directed by a gadget controlled not by you, however by various separate super combinations? With truly no fallback to stupid morally sound beast constrain genuine substances, for example, steel keys and $50 bills?

I excessively might want to leave my home with just my telephone and leave my keys and wallet in the past where they have a place. Anyway it appears like before we do that all at once, we have to tackle the same issues that appear to be emitting all over else around our reality, both online and disconnected from the net: excess, security.


Carry Keys, Wallet and Cell Phones: Till When

By Shristi Baral →
Smart phone, of course are build for ease and comfort. These hi-tech devices actually simplify our life. According to new research it is said that smartphone developers should develop up a provision to end on distraction during driving. While running down the road in car, people are engaged more in phone then on driving! Rather than the hooding of "Don't mix Drink and Drive" there, now should be "don't mix text and drive". Tough but true! the pre-loaded several deal finding and location apps which are pre -installed in the phone alerts wherever you go! The functionality seems to be best but is bothering during driving and making less focus on driving!

Everybody discusses the dangers of messaging and driving, and our pavlovian need to react to approaching messages while in the driver's seat. In any case alarm fights concentrated on changing client conduct can just go so far – now is the right time for a few OS-level intercession.

Not disregarding the reality there are today many outsider applications that can either impair messaging, caution to or screen the quantity of times somebody is messaging in the driver's seat, or help you abstain from messaging through voice gimmicks or portrayal. However they are not full arrangements, particularly on ios which confines applications' capacity to control OS characteristics. Also they just manage on one of numerous issues with in the driver's seat utilization of cell phones: messaging

A genuine arrangement would likewise take out the various numerous distractions that cell phones bring, including the buzz sound of applications, continually clamoring for clients' consideration.

Advanced cell phones are outfitted with a scope of sensors that can discover things like your area, rise, orientation, and whether you're strolling or driving. A few applications, in the same way as the social driving application Waze, later gained by Google, tap into cell phone sensors trying to make utilizing its application more secure for drivers. For instance, Waze automatically disables the texting when it discovered motion of car.

However shouldn't something be said about the other applications that don't have car motion sensor? Shouldn't they, as well, begin considering whether clients ought to have the capacity to include content at 60 mph? Couldn't that Facebook post hold up, for instance? Is it necessary to tweet that at that instance?

But surrendering the decision over to application distributes may not be the best arrangement.

But when all the application developers stop or block the applications usage during driving, the problem that they could find declining engagement and client dissatisfactions. When its all said and done, simply on the grounds that you're speeding not far off in a vehicle or something to that affect, that doesn't mean you're driving it. What's more that implies application producers would need to do what Waze did – have a "withdraw" instrument where you tell the application that you're riding in a traveler seat. (As a traveler, that is an irritating peculiarity to face each time you dispatch an application while in the auto. Also for drivers "tricking" the framework, it could exacerbate matters.)

As opposed to asking application designers to reconfigure their applications for more secure utilization, a superior arrangement would be a framework level change: an "auto mode" setting, actuated when your telephone is associated with the auto through Bluetooth or physically connecting it to the vehicle can be a better alternative.

What about and end on distracted driving: Smartphone

By Shristi Baral →

Cyber criminals seem to have it good these days. With the repeated hacking of Sony, Bitcoin and financial giants like JP Morgan, it seems like no one is safe. In recent years, cybercrime has steadily increased; in 2013, targeted cyber-attacks increased 91% from the previous year. 2014 far surpassed 2013 in number of attacks, not even including the massive Sony breach. Half of the data stolen is financial, and cyber-terrorism is coming to the forefront with the threats against Sony and the American media over the comedy movie The Interview. Black hat hackers are getting bolder, more powerful. 

cyber safety

Protecting Yourself from the Rising Threat of Cybercriminals

By shailesh gyawali →
Apple's iPhone 6 and iPhone 6 Plus are just few months old but Apple watchers are busy looking ahead in 2015 for what Apple's Smartphone plans for the year. Here, we round up all of the rumors about the iPhone 6's successor, dubbed iPhone 6S, including release date rumors, specs and new features.

iPhone 6S release date rumours: When is the iPhone 6S coming out?

September 2015 is the most likely date for release for iPhone 6S, no changes with Apple's iPhone release schedule history. The iPhone 6 and 6 Plus were released in September 2014, the iPhone 5S and iPhone 5C in September 2013, the iPhone 5 in September 2012 and the iPhone 4S in October 2011.

It is also possible that Apple will start releasing new Smartphone twice a year, to keep up with rivals such as Samsung, HTC, LG, Sony and more.

But rumors from Stabley Times, claims: "Our source says that Apple is hesitant about launching the iWatch in the spring of 2015 without a new iPhone to go along with it, as it could give hesitant consumers an excuse to wait on buying both until the fall."

Note that the report calls the Apple Watch the 'iWatch', a name that was widely rumored for Apple's smartwatch but wasn't used by the company.

iPhone 6S rumors: What new features will the iPhone 6S have?

Rumors about iPhones still haven’t picked pace but yeah, we can expect to see them tumbling in daily as 2015 continues. Some new features, specs and designs are listed below.

It is suggested that iPhone 6S will be joined by an 'iPhone 6S mini', a new 4in Smartphone from Apple that will launch alongside the iPhone 6S and 5.5in iPhone 7 in 2015.

Regarding iPhone 6S, it is expected that iPhone will stick in its 4.7inch display, as screen size
isnt going well with fans so far. The physical outlook will also be same so expect the same slim, light and rounded design that's sported by the iPhone 6 to be present when the iPhone 6S arrives. Some rumors also inspire that it will have "sidewall displays" that extend onto the sides of the iPhone, providing interactive or touch-sensitive portions that provide access to the slide-to-unlock feature, music player controls, messaging readout, caller ID, system controls and more.

Also rumors are about a 3D pressure sensor for the iphone 6s' screen, which could imply that Apple is wanting to bring the Force Technology that it utilizes as a part of its Apple Watch to empower the iphone 6s to separate between a tap and a press, which could give an intriguing approach to communicate with the Smartphone.

iPhone 6S rumors: Camera

Chinese website United Daily News says that Apple's iPhone 6S will have a dual-lens camera that   offers optical zoom capabilities and allow users to capture "DSLR-quality imagery.". The aperture is likely to improve, too.

iPhone 6S rumors: Processor

Rumored name of new processor is A9; being manufactured by Samsung, which is apparently in talks with Apple about becoming the sole manufacturer of its chips, a role it once had before the responsibility was handed over to the Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC).
iPhone 6S will have 2GB or RAM rather than 1GB found in the iPhone 6 and iPhone 6 Plus, which could indicate that iOS 9 will have better multitasking features that would be possible thanks to the extra memory.

iPhone 6S rumors: Gaming joystick Home button

The Home button could have a spring beneath it that allows it to pop up and become a joystick for when you're playing one of the many amazing games available on the iOS App Store.

iPhone 6S rumors: Battery life

There have been some rumors about different charging methods for the iPhone 6S, including wireless charging, as well as a new, reversible USB charger.

This is all for this time. Keep checking for new updates of this news.

iPhone 6S Release Date Rumors & New Features: Could Have Joystick Home Button

By Shristi Baral →
A big surprise is expected from Apple this week. Apple is expected to say this week that it has sold more iPhones in China than on its home turf in the US for the first time last year, highlighting the shifting power balance of the smartphone market.

Analysts evaluate that the US tech group reached at the defining moment in iphone deals in the wake of extending its vicinity in China a year ago by means of deal with China Mobile, the nation's biggest network operator,  and after the arrival of the most recent iphone 6 in the nation in October.

The iPhones's market share in China comes as Samsung, the biggest Smartphone market leader, has stumbled and the rapid rise of low-cost challenger Xiaomi in that region.

Tim Cook, CEO, had said in 2013 that he anticipated that China will in the end overwhelm the US as Apple's single biggest wellspring of income. The iphone as of now records for more than 50% of Apple's aggregate deals and a significantly bigger offer of its share.

Analysts at UBS appraise that China represented 36% of iphone shipments in the latest quarter, thought about with 24% for the US. In the same period a year ago, 29% of units were sold in the US and 22% were in China, UBS said.

"It's as of now been a decent year, building up to the peak of this quarter," said Ben Bajarin, expert at Creative Strategies, alluding to Apple's status on the planet's biggest cell phone market.

 "It prompts a great deal more hopefulness for China ". Mr Bajarin's estimate recommends around 2m+ numbers of iphones were sold in China than North America in the quarter. He added that the dispatch of Apple's new Watch in China in the advancing months was prone to build dependability among first-time Apple clients.

"They will probably accomplish more in China than US from here on out," he said. "It surely
indicates how critical the China market is to Apple's upside."

While China's mobile market is bigger and becoming speedier than in the inexorably immersed US, Apple confronts challenges there as well, from new rivalry to run-ins with the Chinese government. The latest iPhones’ Chinese release was delayed by almost a month after a protracted regulatory review process.

China is becoming more essential to Apple however that does not mean the iphone is as huge a player there as it has been on its home turf of the US. Lower-cost gadgets, most utilizing Google's Android OS, still overwhelm the Chinese market.

China Tops US in iPhone Sales

By Shristi Baral →
Several sources are claiming that Google plans to launch a "wireless carrier", not if a complete wireless newtwork, but  a virtual carrier wholesaling Sprint or T-Mobile service, like Tracfone and Straight Talk.

Google has this idea in mind for years. I still remember company talking about CES in 2010.That time Google was disappointed at how cell telephone sales in the U.S. are essentially controlled by the carriers, and it needed to break the logjam and enhance access to the most recent Android phones.The idea never got off the ground.

The circumstances now is better, not more terrible, so I'm experiencing difficulty making sense of what Google would need to change in wireless. There's been a thriving of GSM virtual operators like Straight Talk, Metropcs, and Cricket, which charge low rates and acknowledge unlocked phones. T Mobile and Sprint are locked in an unlimited-data price war. Basically everybody who has a smart phone needs one. Rivalry is working fine for users.

The greatest roadblocks in U.S. wireless now aren't service plans price It's that numerous individuals see Sprint's and T-Mobile's system coverage as not competitive with AT&T and Verizon, and that individuals aren't used to purchase phones outside carrier stores. Google's deal couldn't change its carriers' network coverage, and Google isn't very good at selling hard goods.

Also, remember the First Rule of MVNOs: a carrier will never sign an MVNO contract that eats into its own business. . I'm having a considerable measure of trouble making sense of how Google's prerogative could prod the wireless industry to cut prices and improve speeds," as the Wall Street Journal says, in light of the fact that Sprint and T-Mobile wouldn't let Google onto their systems if they felt it would cut into their central business.

Possibly Google could offer sponsored, free data access to Google services.  But Google's been moving away from subsidizing devices—look at the sky-high price of the Nexus 6 as compared to the Nexus 5, for instance.

Alternately maybe Google could do a business-centered MVNO, tied in with Google Apps for Business and Google's new  domain-name service. Sprint and T-Mobile haven't made a decent job keeping and developing their little business customers throughout the years. That pitch would most likely run into business' commonly low presumption of Sprint and T-Mobile system scope, however.

There's one way Google could truly shake up the business in the U.S. utilizing a wireless service, and it doesn't need to do with smart phones.

The crisis in the U.S. isn't about wireless; its about home Internet, where we have little rivalry and large high costs. Google has been wading into that fight with Google Fiber, yet its exceptionally costly to construct new fiber lines to homes.

Sprint's "Spark" spectrum, on the other hand, is perfect for settled wireless home Internet. Truth be told, Sprint used to offer unlimited use fixed wireless home Internet  for quite a long time under the Clear brand. It has quit offering that service, and from that point forward, all we've heard is a potential tie-up in the middle of Sprint and Dish on the topic.

A remote home broadband service from Google, Sprint, and T-Mobile would drive DSL providers, particularly, to bring down their costs, build benefit or get constrained out of the market. With a Spark product focused at low-pay ranges of urban communities and maybe a 700mhz T-Mobile item focused at provincial zones, Google could  bridge the digital divide and get many individuals  bigger windows onto the Internet. That would be a much needed refresher for millions.

Google Planning To Launch Wireless Carrier, How This Could Change America !

By Shristi Baral →
Microsoft is going 3D.

Revealed today alongside the new Windows 10 OS, the company's holographic interface looks magnificent. It even resembles what's to come! Anyway here in the present, where super-flat screens in our pockets command individualized computing, Windows 10 still won't set Microsoft back in the most critical race. The company went to the new versatile computing world. And more likely that is the place it will probably remain.

In today's keynote, Microsoft flaunted another Windows 10 gimmick called Continuum, which, in the same way as Apple's Continuity, is intended to make moving from PC to tablet to phone as seamless as could be expected under the circumstances. Indeed, the Windows 10 experience may be significantly more continuous, since Microsoft is making "all inclusive applications"—beginning with Word, Excel,

Powerpoint, and Photos—that the company says will run over all gadgets with simply a couple of changes to the interface.  This device-agnostic approach to the OS is the inexorable future and,  from multiple points of view, as of now the present. Yet will it all of a sudden make ios and Android clients switch to a Windows telephone or a Surface tablet?

Not likely. The race to turn into the world's overwhelming mobile operating systems is over. Apple and Google won. Microsoft's redesigns to Windows aren't such a great amount about attempting to peel off a huge swath of the consumer market however to keep the major clients at the center of its business from absconding. It may do that, however very little much more.

Witness Microsoft's response to Siri and Google Now, called Cortana. The voice-activated interactive assistant will be coordinated into the desktop. It's tricky to envision how that will function in an office with everybody yammering at their devices. In any case it seemingly puts Microsoft keeping pace with its rivals.

The same could be said for Spartan, the Windows 10 web browsers, modified from scratch.  Spartan has gotten some great development press. Anyway the desires set by Internet Explorer have been so low for so long that Microsoft could have recently sent Firefox or Chrome with Windows and been hailed as fiercely imaginative.

As has happened for a large portion of the 21st century, the new features Microsoft uncovered today except for its holograms are all about getting up with the items that have set the pace. And merely just climbing to the beginning line isn't a method for altering the shape of consumer sentiment.

Rather, with Windows 10, Microsoft has provided for them a tiny bit of protection. Whenever workers at some gigantic corporation that runs Windows go whimpering to an IT supervisor that their work telephones can't do everything their iphones or Galaxy Notes can, the administrator can indicate Windows 10 and say: "Beyond any doubt they do." Or  at least close enough.

Windows 10: Looks Pretty Cool, But Still So Far Behind

By Shristi Baral →
The cost of Bitcoin has taken bit of a swoop throughout the last couple of days, shedding in excess of 20 percent of its esteem in the most recent 24 hours. The offer off, in the same way as other offer offs and encourages before it, draws a ton of consideration and inquiries concerning what it implies for the fate of the technology. Here's the reason I don't concentrate on value much.

Like the early Web, Bitcoin is an open stage that nobody claims, and on top of which anybody can construct without needing to get any other person's consent. Furthermore much the same as the early Web, achievement obliges investors, business people, and engineers to manufacture the framework and applications that will make it helpful to normal clients.

The World Wide Web was conceived by Tim Berners-Lee; in the paper he proposed it in 1989. First website was lunched in 1990 after he worked inthe code for a whole year. he first popular Web browser didn’t come until 1993 when Marc Andreessen and the team at the National Center for Supercomputing Applications released Mosaic. The following year Andreessen started Netscape and released the Netscape Navigator browser in 1994.

Those of us mature enough to remember utilizing Navigator to search the Web over a Winsock connection on a 56k baud modem can verify that it was not the astounding knowledge we are granted today. Actually, on the off chance that you couldn't see that the technology would develop, you would have inferred that it was for all  pointless intents and purpose. For one thing, there was no simple approach to discover things on the Web. All things considered, we didn't get Google until 1998.

Google is presently the most visited site on the planet. Second to it is Facebook, and for some individuals the Web is basically synonymous with long range interpersonal communication. Yet Facebook was not founded until 2004–a full 14 years after the Web was first conceived.

So in the parallel: Bitcoin was introduced in 2008 in a paper by Satoshi Nakamoto. He worked on implementing the idea into code, mining the first block of the blockchain in January of 2009. So, if we take the Web as a parallel, we’re at the stage in Bitcoin were we would hope to see a Mosaic level development, not a Facebook.

We have to consider that, its the early days. The Googles and Facebooks of Bitcoin–the killer apps that will make the technology indispensable for ordinary users–may not come for another 5 years.

A little different form early web timeline, though, Bitcoin has a price ticker people look at daily, and so they wring their hands. Every dunk and spike in the cost gets a ton of consideration and spells either fate or "nonsensical extravagance." But as Marc Andreessen has brought up,“the price of domain names didn’t determine the usefulness of the Internet.”

Because of a more extended time horizon, you can put the transient drops and rallies in cost of Bitcoin in point of view. So don't stress to such an extent.

Don't Worry, The Price of Bitcoin Doesn’t Matter Right Now

By Shristi Baral →
According to NSA research detailed in documents from the Edward Snowden cache, Chinese army hackers apparently attacked U.S. Department of Defense networks, and caused more than $100 million worth of damage.

Germany’s Der Spiegel published a story on Saturday based on the Snowden documents, that described some of the offensive “digital weapons” the NSA has developed and generally outlined the chaotic, unregulated arms race that’s ramping up in the digital realm.

A substantial piece of the article concentrated on the power of different nations – something that is not at one time deliver firmly in productions of Snowden's disclosures – and how the NSA tracks what foreign intelligence agencies steal, then steals that information from them. This finesse practice is clearly known as "Fourth Party Collection".

However one Snowden document outlined damage execute by the Chinese Army on the U.S.’s own military  infrastructure. It’s a presentation from a few years back that’s based on the findings of the NSA’s “Byzantine Hades” research into Chinese computer network exploitation, and it referred to more than  30,000 incidents involving Department of Defense systems, over 500 of which it called “significant intrusions”. More than 1,600 computers on the DoD network were affected.

China who were in target of information on U.S. missile navigation and tracking systems, nuclear submarine and anti-air missile designs, space-based laser technology, and various military jets executed the DoD and it cost more than $100 to recover the damage and build up the networks again.

Document also reveals that when NSA tracked back the attackers of DoD, they found the source of the attack and also the information the Chinese had stolen from others which includes some sensitive information from United Nations too.

As per Canadian documents, drawn up by the Canadian NSA partner CSEC, detailed spyware implants dubbed Snowball and Snowman; a system collectively referred to as Snowglobe, that CSEC thought “with moderate certainty” was the work of the French. In the case, the targets were ran, former French colonies such as Algeria and the Ivory Coast, and European countries such as Greece, Norway and Spain. Also the malware was targeting France itself.

One NSA presentation proclaims that "the next major conflict will start in cyberspace." To that end, the US government is currently undertaking a massive effort to digitally arm itself for network warfare. For the 2013-2016 secret intelligence budget, the NSA projected it would need around $1 billion in order to increase the strength of its computer network attack operations. The budget included an increase of some $32 million for "unconventional solutions" alone.

Chinese Hackers Cost US Over $100 Million

By Shristi Baral →

Though many people opt to spend thousands for a top of the line gaming PC, the smarter nerd knows they can build something comparable or even better for at least half the price. The trade-off, however, is that you have to construct the machine yourself. Luckily, the process is much less daunting than it seems at first so long as you break it down into steps.

Hardware Parts Required for Gaming Computer

By shailesh gyawali →