Thinkdigital World Technology Reviews Tech Opinion Digital News

Recent Posts

Bits of gossip about an Apple-made TV set began as ahead of 2010, when an analyst named Gene Munster predicted its launch within of "two to four years." Munster would go ahead to be the Apple HDTV's most vocal champion, broadcasting various times through the mediating years that it was just not too far off, a fata morgana gradually weaving farther of compass. 

What Munster and other excited experts could never entirely illustrate, however, is the reason Apple would make a TV set in any case. Then again rather, what might be in it for them. 

TV is a famously thin margin business, as indicated by IHS expert Paul Gagnon, gross edges normal out to around 10 percent (net margin, in the interim, which considers promoting and other subordinate expenses, adds up to an earn back the original investment suggestion for most). It's additionally moderate turnover; you don't purchase another TV like every year, similar to you would a phone or (Apple hopes) a watch. You clutch your set for 8-9-10 years on the off chance that you would; it be able to's not worth making good for another one unless the old one kicks the bucket, or until another standard like 4K pressures you into action.

"The one thing that is constantly struck me as odd about Apple entering a business like this," says Gagnon, "is the way frequently individuals redesign or change their devices. Something like a PC or cell telephone, they're for the most part overhauling each two to five years, so Apple can depend on offering more equipment." 

It's not difficult to profit offering TV sets, but rather it is, hard. All the more significantly, its not the sort of cash Apple likes to make. The company's anticipated gross overall revenue for 2015 is knocking up against 40 percent, four times what a TV commonly commands. And thanks to sluggish iPad sales, it’s found out the hard way that products with long lifespans don’t look so hot on its earnings reports.

TV would likewise be an arena in which Apple would need to do something it (rightly) detests: cede control. Yes, its feasible going to present a gushing TV arrange for this late spring, one that would permit rope cutters to sidestep the intense interfaces and client administration bad dreams of Comcast and TWC. In any case, the millions and a large number of individuals why should prepared go separate ways with their customary link organizations will encounter all the conventional dissatisfactions of ISPs through a container with a whopping huge' Apple logo on it. Bad by association is still bad. Apple doesn’t do bad.

What's more, those are simply the features. Discovering space to show an Apple HDTV in Apple Stores would have been a logistical bad dream. Apple has a lot of TV related licenses, however for highlights (sans glasses 3D, motion control remote) that have either officially tumbled in the commercial center or aren't a sufficient differentiator to make wading into the HDTV waters justified, despite all the trouble. 

In this present reality where TV sets are so altogether commoditized, there's essentially no executioner highlight Apple can give that raises it worth the hell. Much Munster, the Don Quixote to Apple's HDTV windmill, has at last conceded as much, saying in a note to customers that he  “incorrectly assumed that a combination of Siri, FaceTime, a TV app store, and PrimeSense based motion control could be compelling enough as a unique feature set for the device.”

Additionally, Apple as of now has the ideal way into your parlor.

The Apple TV That Makes Sense

For quite a long time, Apple administrators have portrayed its minimal set-top box hockey puck as a "hobby" as it bested 25 million aggregate deals recently. With a revive slated for this mid year, Apple TV is ready to end up quite a lot more. 

The forthcoming Apple TV will purportedly accompany applications including a lot of amusements and an extravagant new remote, smart home hub capabilities, and seamless integration with Apple’s laptops, smartphones, watches, and more.  It's likewise the ideal approach to execute against Apple's actual vision of what TV ought to be. 

"The main thing I think Apple could do that would be truly intense for other  company to duplicate would be the services; and OS," says Gagnon. "Anyway, you needn't bother with a $2000 TV to do that; they can do it with a $100 set-top box."

Instead of the cumbersome,  assembling TVs, a set-top box permits Cupertino to form any current TV into its home stimulation vision. It takes into account the likelihood of the massive edges Apple inclines toward, at a sufficiently reasonable value direct that its sensible toward overhaul each couple of years—or even better, to purchase numerous units for a solitary family.

It additionally lets Apple control each part of your experience, making separation between what its putting forth normal interfaces, substance synched over the majority of your gadgets, fun reflecting traps and what your link organization can't, as opposed to conflating the two. These points of interest vanish the moment you stuff them inside a 65-inch show rather than a minor black box. 


Why am Apple HDTV Never Made Any Sense

By Shristi Baral →
The silicon creatures, the impression of human inside of a metallic  body, robots have dependably been an image of improvement of Artificial Intelligence. How far we can go to make something that can flawlessly imitate human? What are the limits that we can acquire in a robot so that it does not violet the three mainstream rules of robotics!

A robot is about whose reflection we are attempting to assemble.
Will we just make astute, proficient robots who will do what they're told - manufactured, normally, in the picture of your normal center administration functionary? 

Or then again will we endeavor to assemble beasts - only in light of the fact that we like to put our fingers in the flame at times?

It seems like the start of a prophetically calamitous science fiction film. A New Zealand AI company is building the angriest robot on the planet in the trusts of helping organizations to comprehend and pacify furious clients. The innovation firm, Touchpoint has spent more than £230,000 on the undertaking task, which is required to be live before the year's over. 

Anyway, is it time to begin planning for the robotic upheaval? Not exactly – however the long haul eventual fate of artificial intelligence is verifiably terrifying.

Touchpoint's irate robot might be customized to hint at fundamental fierceness, and will act in a notably diverse manner from a truly furious human. Touchpoint is working with a bank so its machines can better comprehend why clients get irate. 

In fact, Touchpoint CEO Frank van der Velden told the Australian Business Review: "Organizations don't have the quantities of staff to experience this physically. It's exceptionally troublesome. Take a bank for instance, they get a whale of a considerable measure of information consistently. In any case, it gets to a point where that dataset develops so substantial that it gets to be inane unless you can decipher it. That is the place Radiant, the angry bot will fit in." 

Despite the fact that irate robots may not be such a risk, Dr Armstrong says that its greatly hard to foresee whether Artificial Intelligence will inevitably bring about mischief to people. 

"Knowledge itself has permitted us to rule the planet, so conceivably higher insight may prompt much higher force," he says. "AIs could turn out to be amazingly effective and after that their inclinations would impact the heading without bounds. On the off chance that these inclinations are not interested in some human component then things could wind up severely for us." 

Be that as it may, however it appears to be sure that AIs will turn out to be all the more intense in the nearing decades, its a long way from sure that they'll achieve a critical level of force. "There's incredible vulnerability here," says Dr Armstrong. 

The eventual fate of Artificial Intelligence is to a great degree indeterminate, and researchers like Dr Armstrong are attempting to verify we'll be safe from unsafe robots. Be that as it may, for the present, the furious robot in New Zealand represents no genuine risk. Science fiction awfulness stories haven't get to be reality yet.

Super AI or a complete copy of human has dependably been a dubious theme. A side where Mr. Gates and Mr. Hawking advocate against the improvement of super AI a few researchers are in the period of its advancement. The aftereffect of AI has dependably been indeterminate. Being unaware of what the final piece will result : a divine or a devil , the researches are going on and this angry bot "radiant" is a start of it.

Future of Angry robot: Divine or Devil

By Shristi Baral →
Google :After developing its self sufficient, self driving car, finally has decided to launch it on public street. The magic of science that had previously been seen roaming around Google's compound now will be seen roaming, learning in streets in California. Well it is yet to see if it can match the critical decision making like human being when it comes on driving on road. 

Google on Friday declared it will start testing models of its completely self-sufficient self-driving autos on open streets. The vehicles won't meander too a long way from their Mountain View, California, home - yet this most recent period of testing could be discriminating both for developing positive buyer observations, and impacting future enactment influencing the early part.

Google has a couple of driverless auto models that will be trying this late spring, said Chris Urmson, executive of the Google Self-Driving Car Project. The models are taking into account the well known Smart Fortwo-like air pocket plans that have turn out to be practically synonymous with self-driving autos.

Google already had inclined vigorously on changed Lexus RX450h SUVs to lead its examination into independent vehicle advancements. The SUVs have logged a near to a million miles of independent driving on test tracks and open streets since the begin of the undertaking, and they have been voyaging around 10,000 miles every week, said Umrson.

Mountain View inhabitants needn't stress over driverless autos flying around their neighborhoods at high speeds. The Google autos will work at an "area well disposed" top velocity of 25mph, and they'll have driver on board - and also a removable directing wheel, quickening agent pedal, and brake pedal - ought to manual operation be justified, the organization said.

In the advancing years, Google needs to dispatch test cases programs so it can take in more about how individuals would utilize driverless autos. For the present, however, the organization needs to gage open impression of the vehicles and find challenges extraordinary to driverless autos.

What are the challenges and how is Google working to overcome them!

In the following period of testing and examination, Google will examine a greater amount of the situations the vehicles will confront - likely and improbable - once the general population begins to receive driverless autos.

As encouraging as the innovation seems to be, there are still some characterizing difficulties that could demonstrate or negate its suitability for the close term, as indicated by Kelley Blue Book investigator Akshay Anand.

While people are inclined to making lapses connected with taking care of a vehicle, the counterfeit consciousness managing self-ruling autos could battle with distinguishing basic components of the roadways, as per Anand.

For instance, how well will a robot have the capacity to perceive a stone from a basic supply sack in the roadway?

"Google likewise needs to always overhaul every last guide, a tall errand thinking of it as' self-sufficient autos haven't verge on scouring a larger part of the streets out there," Anand told TechNewsWorld. "In the event that another red light isn't introduced onto the guide framework, the self-ruling auto may just run the red light. This is an issue that needs tending to."

Another test for Google will be securing and utilizing a supplier system, something OEMs have had years to set up, Anand called attention to.

Without a storied history of vehicle advancement, Google additionally will need to persuade customers of its car know-how. That could be to a lesser extent a test for independent vehicles discharged in Detroit or Germany, or any of the auto business' other powerhouse districts.

In spite of the impediments its confronts, Anand watched, Google has one noteworthy component letting it all out: assets.

And if you are thinking to own the car, you will still have to wait.. wait for this magnificent invention to win the confidence of the makers!!  

Google Car On Street: Can It Match Human Decision Making??

By Shristi Baral →

The poorly coordinated rescue efforts on the aftermath of the recent Nepali quake saw the tech-assistance of various sorts ranging from primitive radios and online tools to 50-ton warplanes and small aerial drones.



Technology used on Nepali earthquake search, rescue and relief efforts

By shailesh gyawali →
Recently, my father asked like how I will respond if he gift one of his impressively fancy mechanical watches, the first of which he received from his parents when he graduated from college.

He took some time before making decision if I have hits a milestone deserving of an heirloom Cartier or an IWC. But the Apple Watch, which after several months of buildup and anticipation will finally be available to the public on April 24, feels like a looming force that may well change my generation’s idea of what a luxury watch is.

 In the same way as other smartwatches, Apple's is intended to give you a chance to rapidly direct response to instant messages, check the climate, discover a perfume store or things you'd typically depend on your cell phone to do.

Yet while a few smartwatches—also called "connected watches" and "wearables"—have entered the business, none has so specifically and deftly trained in on both the male and female extravagance and fashion buyer. To wit, the company welcomed a universal team of fashion designers out to its home office in Cupertino, California, for the declaration of the watch last September. Before long subsequently, the watch showed up at Paris fashion week, where Apple's design masters Jonathan Ive and Marc Newson demonstrated to it to the likes of Vogue editor Anna Wintour and Chanel creative director Karl Lagerfeld. Strapped to a model in a Céline dress, the watch graced the front of Vogue China's November issue, its first significant style magazine excursion.

Anyhow maybe most essential is that, while least level Apple Watches begin at $349 and go up to $1,099, with a show of band that range from lively elastic to steel interfaces, Apple  is putting forth a provocatively top end version called the Edition, which begins at $10,000 and goes up to $17,000. These are made of 18 karat rose gold or yellow gold with a mixture of straps. To attempt one on, you need to make an arrangement at an Apple store that conveys them (not all do). Furthermore, arrangements are at present almost difficult to land. In other words, the Apple Watch is unmistakably being placed as an extravagance item. This all brings up the issue what do the young men in Geneva and Paris think? Will Apple Watch dominance some day force them to abandon their craft and jump into the smartwatch business to stay afloat?

From various perspectives, their response adds up to minimal more than the brushing endlessly of a gently troublesome fly. "I don't accept the Apple Watch will influence the Hublots and Breitlings and Pateks," said Jean-Claude Biver, who is president of LVMH's watch division and CEO of brand Tag Heuer. "You don't purchase a $20,000 watch to let you know what time it is. Time is all over the place. You purchase it in light of the fact that it is a bit of workmanship. Furthermore, art is eternity.”

Which raises the enormous ticking elephant in the room: Apple Watches will in all likelihood never be legacy pieces, regardless of the amount of gold they are cut from, in light of the fact that, similar to your iPhone and MacBook, they will inescapably get to be out of date. In the interim, mechanical watches can, with standard support, keep going for quite a long time if not hundreds of years. This is a slant resounded by almost everybody I conversed with. (Apple declined to remark on the life span of its watches.)

Mr. Biver said that Tag Heuer chose to make an associated timepiece to offer purchasers a luxury choice that will be essentially less extravagant than the Apple Edition. "If I somehow managed to offer you a $10,000 or $20,000 smartwatch, my soul would have an issue," he said. "Perhaps it ought to have a name, as on cigarettes. Cautioning: This watch is not everlasting." Tag's so far anonymous smartwatch will probably begin at just shy of $1,000, said Mr. Biver, while models in ultralight magnesium or titanium could go up to $2,500.

Tag isn't the only one among traditional watchmakers in getting into the keen amusement. In January, Montblanc reported the Montblanc TimeWalker Urban Speed e-Strap, which turns out in June and will be around $400. It's an imaginative arrangement: All of the gadgetry is in the strap itself (you can associate it to any timepiece, not simply a Montblanc), implying that the watch won't wind up in the reusing receptacle once the innovation gets to be obsolete or the following enormous thing tags along.

Still, Alexander Schmiedt, executive of watches at Montblanc, sees this move as a little gesture to keen that won't generally influence their bread and butter. "The more we have interconnected advancements, the more individuals will acknowledge precisely the inverse," he said.

So maybe smartwatches and customary extravagance can at last exist together gently. Aurel Bacs, leader of the new watch office at Phillips sales management firm thinks so. “Luxury smartwatches could be like a Porsche with a hybrid engine,” he said. “We can have the modern and sensible with the traditional and luxurious. But if there are two camps of watches, that’s OK. The guy who drinks a $1,000 Bordeaux at dinner can still have an energy drink the next morning.”

There's just space on a man's left wrist for one watch at once; everybody will have decisions to make. Club Monaco menswear planner Aaron Levine falls into the mechanical-just camp. "When I wear a mechanical watch, I think about the exactness needed to make it chip away at such a micro scale. That is really wonderful instead of simply a chip," said Mr. Levine, who possesses a few vintage Rolexes and a Bulova Tank acquired from his dad. "A watch is the main bit of gems I wear other than a wedding band. I'm not going to surrender that effortlessly."

For the all the more digitally sagacious watch wearer who grew up with cell phones or is dug in the advanced world, on the other hand, the gold Apple Watch Edition speaks to an alternate sort of extravagance that is more than a trick. Sky Gellatly, a managing partner of consumer marketing agency Team Epiphany, said he'd think about purchasing as an Edition watch, regardless of the fact that it couldn't ever supplant his prized Audemars Piguet Royal Oak Offshore.

In any case shouldn't we think about the possibility of his $10,000 smartwatch getting to be out of date in a couple of years? "It doesn't trouble me excessively," he said. "That is the open door cost for living at the pace of advancement, would it say it isn't? It's similar to paying many thousands to sit on the first SpaceX flight. The individuals who purchase the watch are deciding to be at the front of the pack where innovation, utility and outline all focalize." He included, "As it would turn out, we're here for a decent time, not quite a while long, are we?".

The Watch War: Will the Apple Watch Fade the Classic Swiss Watch?

By Shristi Baral →
The names of of Apple product like iPod, iPad, iMac are so iconic. Apple managed to pick "iPad", which was broadly prospected a female hygiene item - and changed it into the famous vocabulary of youngsters and Wall Street analyst alike.

However, Apple does significantly more than give enormous and striking names to items - it even names key highlights. For example, when Apple presented a sharp new pixel-thick screen, it did something unimaginably brilliant - it gave the highlight a unique name - a "Retina" display.

That basic methodology of naming features cooperate in their success. Take a sharp look, Apple's product and feature names work together in slick ways, even going so far as to become the new standard by which competitors' similar features are not only judged, but also understood by regular people.

Naming Power

Lets take "Touch ID" for example, the biometric method of Apple by which secure user login and password are provided by fingerprints. Apple's decision in name is both absolutely illustrative - touch the button to give your ID - and nonthreatening. Touch is generally something worth being thankful for, and practically every potential Apple purchaser comprehends what an ID is.

After introducing Touch ID in the iPhone 5s, Apple changed this into a line-item feature. Since because Apple put any effort on marketing with this feature as well as the intuitive name, and by now easy-to-understand feature that requires very little thought for a potential consumer to understand it. We can understand how Apple put a specific name to its feature so that it don't just remain to list in the specs.

Similar is what Apple did with "Retina Display". When Apple came with Retina feature, there were other phones in market with similar feature. What apple did is, it didn't join in the mega pixel war that digital world has been plagued for years. Apple just stayed aloof of specs like "577ppi" and just let "Retina" do the talking. That is the only word millions upon millions of customers need (or even want) to hear.

As far as Samsung Galaxy S6 is considered, it boasted 577ppi screen. When I think about most of my smartphone-using friends, relatives and general customers, I am pretty damn sure most if them have no idea what 577ppi means. With respect to what Retina implies, I would wager that no less than a third have a thought, while an alternate third would relate Retina display with a screen highlight that is deserving of being named. For them, Retina is promptly viewed as "great" while 577ppi is simply confusing.

What's more awful is that a few competitors wind up doing likewise: How might you want to be the fellow whose absolute best at offering your item is utilizing your rival to portray it - if not characterize it? Apple is not just utilizing the force of naming to help it market its own particular items to its own clients.

Samsung's Lost Edge

This is something one must take into consideration. When Apple introduced New MacBook, it talked huge on it track-pad technology and also named it "Force Touch". Isn't it a genuine idea? The name has power-- just like what is described about Touch ID. And what is so impactful is that people will consider this feature a great because it has Name ! They are going after the psychological power of name.

Shouldn't we think about the vibrating haptics going ahead underneath the new Force Touch trackpad? It's fueled by Apple's "Taptic Engine," which was introduced a year ago when the Apple Watch was declared. What's the Taptic Engine? A great many people don't know what haptics is because the name itself doesn't loan any intimations, but Taptic Engine? You should simply make the association between the "tap" in Taptic to head down the way of illumination. Taptic, in the same way as Retina - which makes an English-talking individual think about an eye - has a center component of its name that connotes the proposed importance.

This is what the brilliance is exactly about and Apple has woven its naming technique all through itsshowcases and selling effort. At time when Apple watch was introduced, they showed the world the inside of its Apple Watch on its marketing splash pages, with a section showing a rectangle of nothing, what to expect is that rectangle was the Apple Taptic Engine. You can even find the naming power when you go through Apple Watch-- "Glances". Apple said,"We optimized your favorite apps for the wrist by developing Glances -- scannable summaries of the information you seek out most frequently. To see them, you simply swipe up from your watch face."

Lets think this way, the name Glances implies a "use case" for the Apple Watch. The reason behind why people would like to buy Apple watch can be because they can see important information in a quick glance, from their wrist, cool, right? Looking at what Samsung id with their Samsung S6. Some of the introductory tech press responses from Android sweethearts and Samsung enthusiasts - appear to admire the edge glass and how it can be utilized for alerts and user interface alternate ways... be they aren't sure how to explain what it is or why it exists. This isn't their issue. Actually, a significant number of them aren't certain how important it is or simply a tech spaghetti tossed that .Still unaware if the "edge" on the Samsung Galaxy S6 edge is a premium feature, how is it premium again?

The best thing about the edge is that it can be utilized with your most loved contacts. I could discover a few uses for more instant access to my most-used contacts.. Perhaps it could be known as a "Contact Edge." But consider the possibility that designers may have the capacity to utilize the Contact Edge for future applications that wouldn't have anything to do contacts.? Damn. Maybe that would be a terrible name. Or maybe not. What I wonder is this: Did it even occur to Samsung to name it at all?

Apple: What Exactly In Its Name ?

By Shristi Baral →
An enormous battle is preparing that sets Apple Pay against Google Wallet against Samsung Pay and all the players need predominance in what they accept will be the blast of mobile payments where we purchase stuff at retail with a tap or wave of our phone.

You the customer have decisions to make. At this moment, the decision is clear. Own an iPhone, and just Apple Pay meets expectations. Likewise for Android and Google Wallet (although soon Samsung phones running Android will accompany Samsung Pay built in).

Anyhow know this: there are contrasts, unquestionably between Google Wallet and Apple Pay, and a huge one seems to spin around PRIVACY. A federal lawsuit in Northern California wants to know: is Google Wallet keeping an eye on clients - and imparting data to outsiders?

Comprehend: a lot is on the line. What's more, there couldn't be a more horned partition than this one in between Google and its most despised opponent Apple.

Apple, don't imagine it any other way, comprehends this. It has been uproariously yelling its distinction. An example of Apple's situating dialect: "Apple doesn't save your exchange data. With Apple Pay, your payments are private. Apple Pay doesn't store the details of your transactions so they can’t be tied back to you.”

What Apple is asserting is broadly accepted to be valid. Purported tokenization - where the client's primary account number(otherwise known as PAN) is stripped out of the data and supplanted with a token that has no utilization aside from as a placeholder - is focal point of the audience in Apple Pay.

So precisely what's happening with Google in an unexpected way? The claim clarifies. Alice Svenson, et. al. v. Google, is a class activity documenting where Svenson is the lead offended party. Her protest is that she purchased an email application, YCDroid, for $1.77 in Google's Play store and that thus Google imparted to the application developer about her individual data, for example, her place of residence and telephone number. Such data, the suit claims, could encourage fraud.

In an early ruling, the court neglected a lot of Google's movement to reject, hence permitting the suit to continue to trial.

Google, as far as concerns it, said it had no remark on the  court decision.

At the same time it additionally is walking forward with a beefed up Google Wallet that now incorporates parts of platform built for Softcard- the fizzled versatile installment innovation constructed by AT&T, T-Mobile and Verizon and initially called Isis; Google purchased a significant part of the Softcard licensed property.

Google additionally  declared another tie in the middle of Dunkin' Donuts and Google Wallet.

Question is that  Is Google actually infringing on client privacy? Experts appear to be united in accepting the answer is self-evident.

John Pironti, a counselor with ISACA, an independent, nonprofit security organization, was ho-hum

"I don't know why this suit is getting so much consideration," he said. "Credit card companies have been doing this for quite a long time." He included: "obviously Google gives designers access to information on the off chance that they pay enough."

However, suggested Pironti, that is SOP - standard operating procedure.  To be noted that he is not underwriting the practice, simply investigating what is.

Tim Prendergast, CEO and founder of data security company, took a harder line position. “What Google is doing borders on invasive,” he said. “What Google is doing borders on evil, on spying on customers.”

And yet, said Pironti, we are co-conspirators. “If you are not paying for the product, you are the product,” he said. That is, the business model at Google - and just about every other provider of free IT services - revolves around turning user data into cash.

What's more, that, said various specialists, is the reason the California claim matters. "The suit," said Pironti, "is about the governance of disclosure."

Is it sufficient to cover critical divergences in a 30 page record loaded down with standard that no one, ever, peruses? Possibly it is, perhaps it isn't, that is the thing that the California court will choose.

Until then, the bottom-line is: your privacy is dependent upon you.

Is Google Really Selling Your Personal Data From Google Wallet

By Shristi Baral →
Uber being an mobile-app-based transportation network in California, has been facing security issues with their facilities, drivers and people and was supposed to make a serious move to sort out this problem.
But when it made, the tech world remain stunned.

Uber said it had appointed Joe Sullivan to be its first chief security officer,from Facebook, where he held the same position.

Silicon Valley being home to a percentage of the world's brightest specialized personalities. What's more, from Apple to Google, each enormous organization desires the ability of its rivals. Presently include Uber, the ride-hailing organization, to that rivals.

"This is an opportunity to help fabricate the way of life of a youthful and developing association, and to keep expanding upon the well being and security activities that are the foundation of Uber's prosperity," Mr. Sullivan, 46, said in an announcement.

The new contract underlines how Uber is quick turning into a prime selection representative in ability starved Silicon Valley, where youthful tech organizations are willing to pay higher pay rates and offer more prominent advantages to win over the best personalities in the field.

As organizations like Google, Twitter and Facebook have ended up home to a large number of representatives, another era of organizations like Pinterest, Airbnb and Dropbox have begun to poach ability from them.

Uber, specifically, has been forcefully selecting in the San Francisco Bay Area, as indicated by two individuals with learning of the organization's enlisting practices. A vacation posting page on Uber's site shows many open positions in various nations.

For Uber, employing in security is especially critical. In February, the organization unveiled that it had encountered a break of its frameworks, which possibly uncovered the names and driver's permit recognizable proof quantities of upwards of 50,000 of the organization's drivers.

Uber has additionally confronted feedback for its driver screening process; a few officials have blamed the organization for taking alternate ways on historical verification for new drivers. A little number of travelers have affirmed that they were physically or sexually struck by Uber drivers.

As indicated by his set of expectations, Mr. Sullivan will in all probability be in charge of a few of those territories, from regulating the security of Uber's endless driver information to enhancing wellbeing measures for drivers and travelers.

Uber beforehand said it was dealing with new innovation to enhance traveler well-being, including biometric ID and driver checking, and additionally procuring more staff individuals to react to client episodes day and night. On Thursday, Mr. Kalanick likewise insinuated potential coordinated effort with city and state governments on rider wellbeing.

This is liable to be the place Mr. Sullivan's experience will have extensive impact. Before getting to be boss security officer at Facebook, he put in four years at eBay as a senior security chief, and he was likewise a government prosecutor in the Northern District of California's PC hacking unit. In his new work, he will work close by Katherine Tassi, Uber's overseeing direction for information security.

The question remains why Facebook let its first chief security officer to go? Can it be threat to Facebook security in anyway ? Please Comment.

Facebook's Security Chief On Uber's Hand: What's Next

By Shristi Baral →
The Y70 Touch does appear the ideal contender for a desktop substitution on paper, particularly thinking of it as' alluring cost. Anyway a couple minor issues keep it away from significance.

Specs and Pricing

Y70 Touch starts at $1049 and packs in some decent baseline specs like 8GB of RAM, a 1TB Hybrid SSD, an IntelCore-i5 4210H, and Nvidia’s 2GB version of the GTX 860M. Here the review is for the  the fully loaded SKU, and includes the following for $1349:

  • 4th generation Intel Core i7-4710HQ quad-core CPU at 2.50GHz
  • 17.3″ 1080p LED AntiGlare, multitouch screen
  • 4GB Nvidia GTX 860M
  • 1TB hybrid SSD
  • 16GB RAM
  • Intel Dual-Band Wireless AC 3160, Bluetooth 4.0
  • OS: Windows 8.1
  • Ports: Two USB 3.0, One USB 2.0, 2-in-1 SD card reader, HDMI out, headphone/mic in, Ethernet

3 total USB ports, which appears to be a little low for a machine this size and unquestionably not helpful for being a desktop substitution. That implies fixing out at a gaming mouse, USB headset, and outside hard commute. Depending upon your needs, a shabby USB port may be an essential partner.

As always everyone is fan of Y series design code and that amazing signature aesthetic looks sharp as always.This can be a influential factor on purchase.

Praise of keyboard aside, its a smooth looking machine thinking of it as' size. The back of the unit has tender bends, and the stereo speakers extend the red stress to the back sides, complimenting the stressed console and USB ports. Within there's a spacious, delicate touch wrist rest, two JBL speakers (in addition to subwoofer), and a little round power button hat mixes in with the visuals.

It has perfect amount of flash. Not remotely pompous, and it mixes in well whether you're at home or in an office situation.

Genuinely, there's very little to evaluate about the trackpad. Windows 8 motions work. It's large, responsive, and agreeable to use for every day exercises (not gaming clearly). At the same time it doesn't offer that out and out immaculate experience you'll have with something like a MacBook Air, or Dell's XPS 13 trackpad.

And Lenovo? Despite everything possible there are no individual who needs McAfee preinstalled.


In the realm of gaming laptops, Lenovo's Y70 Touch is on the lower end of the range, yet that doesn't mean it gives up quality. It just means that you won't be getting the sort of premium IGZO display found in a Razer Blade. The 1080p LED multitouch  looks awesome with greta view angles  and, in particular, deep blacks and good contrast even in darker scenes.  Touch surface is responsive, and will gradually become acclimated to utilizing it as a part of specific circumstances (mostly productivity tasks).

Gaming Benchmarks

If you are considering for a gaming series, it must deliver medium to high quality visuals at 1080p in playable framerates — a minimum of 30fps and a preferred target of 60fps. With its 4GB Nvidia GTX 860M, it almost checks off every demanding requirement.Here’s a roundup of the games benchmarked and their corresponding framerates:
  • BioShock Infinite: Ultra Quality = 48fps
  • Metro: Last Light Redux: Medium Quality = 51fps
  • Alien: Isolation: High Detail = 60fps
  • Batman: Arkham Origins: All DX11 features on, PhysX normal = 65fps
  • Sleeping Dogs Definitive Edition: Medium Quality = 71fps
  • Tomb Raider: High Quality = 66fps

What Y70 delivers in a arguable budget price is impressible - at least as far as gaming series are concerned.

Heat Factor

Another factor to be considered for gaming series is heat factor. Thanks to the power-sipping architecture of Nvidia’s 860M and Lenovo’s thermal design. Running Fire Strike on a 60 minute loop and toward the end of the loop, measured key contact points on the Y70. The WASD keys topped out at 105F, which cab be considered comfortable if not cool. The hottest point on the front of the laptop was 112F, with the palm wrest a cool 79F.

Battery Life

With 50% brightness and an WiFi on the battery life is 2 hours and 5 minutes which is embarrassing to more expensive and more high-powered gaming notebooks.

Closing Thoughts

The Lenovo Y70 Touch is an appealing laptop with above normal gaming execution that wins its sticker, in spite of the fact that the consideration of just 3 USB ports may keep it from being a genuine desktop substitution. The keyboard— as with the whole Y Series — is a masterpiece, and the machine stays genuinely cool under extreme work. For total gaming experience, it can work best for 2-3 years.


Lenovo Y70 Touch Gaming Laptop Review

By Shristi Baral →
Google isn't wanting but begging the Firefox users to switch their default Search Engine. Few months earlier after Mozilla replaced Google with Yahoo as the default search provider in Firefox in the United States, soon worldwide, Google dropped by 2.4% and Yahoo gained more than 3.1% search share in Internet.

Likewise after the Yahoo-Mozilla deal, Yahoo is recommending a message at the top of its homepage and other properties, encouraging users to “upgrade to the new Firefox”.

In January Google came with video guide for all the Google Search-loving Firefox fans. Google also started telling Firefox users who visited its homepage to set the default experience back to Google with a message saying, “Get to Google faster. Make Google your default search engine.”

This week Firefox users with other default search browsers noticed 2.5 inch board in the Google search page, begging for switch back to Google. Google is taking things up a notch. It’s actually showing big ad-like messages at the top of unrelated search results pages, telling users to switch search engines.

Clicking No Thanks will make it just disappear. If you ignore, it will follow you to 3-4 more searches and go away.  Lots of critics and experts are marking this strategy as begging and desperate. Definitely, this rush and desperateness will grow up Yahoo's confidence and yeah support them move better way ahead.

Outgoing Google CFO Patrick Pichette was asked about Yahoo’s partnership with Mozilla on Google’s recent earnings call. He said:

Everyone know s about the Mozilla-Yahoo deal and so we wont comment more on the partnership and deals we made earlier, we will just take two major steps to make thing go alright. One is our users continue to actually go in, if they love Google, they will continue to find Google, whichever platform, whichever browser, and that’s really what we’ve focused on doing.

And the next piece is the way we can turn them to our long term win. Its very simple. We will make the wonderful products that are magical people will find them….partnerships matter. But at the core of it, you need partnership, because you have a phenomenal product. And that’s what we’re going to continue to build this amazing company.

Google's deal with Apple Safari to remain the default search experience there is set to expire soon. It will be interesting to see how far Google can go begging its users, also from Safari probably.

But its also possible that Apple could  go with Google again but what if Apple changed its mind to support Yahoo or Bing that are making Search Engine better. Yahoo and Microsoft have both been said to be ready to battle for the spot. On Yahoo’s earnings call, CEO Marissa Mayer was pretty clear about really wanting to have Yahoo as the default on Safari. She said:

We all know Safari Platform is one of the premiere search engine in the world, if not the premiere search engine in the world and that what we are always been looking and handling on. Its all about search distribution business. I think we stated that really clearly in the past and I think with Mozilla and also in addition we brought Amazon and eBay onboard with smaller distribution partnerships in Q4, we are in search distribution business and anyone who is in that business needs to be interested in the Safari deal.

Also the Safari users are the most lucrative users in the world and it’s something that we would really like to be able to provide. We work really closely with Mozilla to ultimately bring to their users an experience that they designed and that they feel really suit those users and we welcome the opportunity with any other partner to do the same, particularly one with Apple’s volume and end user base.

It is hereby noted that Google has assumed that it will gain its users back or not get them but likely to get many of them back by such aggressive switchback campaign as it is doing with Mozilla. Not the Search Share war but yeah, it going to be interesting.

Image :Source 

Is Google Begging With Firefox Users ?

By Shristi Baral →